Nomad Watch

Ranked by Environmental Quality

Top nomad destinations ranked by environmental quality, highest first.

World map

Worst Best

Ranked by Environmental Quality

Cities ranked by Environmental Quality
Rank City Score
#1951 GM Sanyang Gambia 7.0
#1952 MW Salima Malawi 7.0
#1953 ZM Chadiza Zambia 7.0
#1954 AQ McMurdo Station Antarctica 7.0
#1955 JP Osaka Japan 6.9
#1956 VN Da Nang Vietnam 6.9
#1957 PL Wroclaw Poland 6.9
#1958 LV Riga Latvia 6.9
#1959 GE Batumi Georgia 6.9
#1960 KR Busan South Korea 6.9
#1961 MX Playa del Carmen Mexico 6.9
#1962 RO Cluj-Napoca Romania 6.9
#1963 MX San Cristobal de las Casas Mexico 6.9
#1964 BG Plovdiv Bulgaria 6.9
#1965 KR Incheon South Korea 6.9
#1966 US Boston United States 6.9
#1967 US Salt Lake City United States 6.9
#1968 PL Poznan Poland 6.9
#1969 CN Zhuhai China 6.9
#1970 CN Kunming China 6.9
#1971 TH Koh Tao Thailand 6.9
#1972 MY Ipoh Malaysia 6.9
#1973 BR Brasília Brazil 6.9
#1974 TR Marmaris Turkey 6.9
#1975 BR Sao Jose dos Campos Brazil 6.9
#1976 GE Kutaisi Georgia 6.9
#1977 ES Playa del Ingles Spain 6.9
#1978 US Fort Lauderdale United States 6.9
#1979 BR Natal Brazil 6.9
#1980 DO Sosúa Dominican Republic 6.9
#1981 IL Haifa Israel 6.9
#1982 TR Kusadasi Turkey 6.9
#1983 IT Bari Italy 6.9
#1984 HU Győr Hungary 6.9
#1985 CZ Plzeň Czech Republic 6.9
#1986 IT Rimini Italy 6.9
#1987 US Tucson United States 6.9
#1988 GT Xela Guatemala 6.9
#1989 BR Aracaju Brazil 6.9
#1990 DO Puerto Plata Dominican Republic 6.9
#1991 IT Syracuse Italy 6.9
#1992 GB Bristol United Kingdom 6.9
#1993 GB Glasgow United Kingdom 6.9
#1994 RS Subotica Serbia 6.9
#1995 FR Rouen France 6.9
#1996 US Savannah United States 6.9
#1997 FR Saint-Étienne France 6.9
#1998 CV Santa Maria Cape Verde 6.9
#1999 LA Thakhek Laos 6.9
#2000 LA Savannakhet Laos 6.9
1,951–2,000 of 3,173