Nomad Watch

Ranked by Mobile Network Coverage

Top nomad destinations ranked by mobile network coverage, highest first.

World map

Worst Best

Ranked by Mobile Network Coverage

Cities ranked by Mobile Network Coverage
Rank City Score
#101 US Las Vegas United States 9.2
#102 AT Innsbruck Austria 9.2
#103 US Washington D.C. United States 9.2
#104 US Atlanta United States 9.2
#105 JP Kyoto Japan 9.2
#106 CN Xiamen China 9.2
#107 MY Petaling Jaya Malaysia 9.2
#108 CN Suzhou China 9.2
#109 CN Xi'an China 9.2
#110 DK Aalborg Denmark 9.2
#111 CN Chongqing China 9.2
#112 JP Naha Japan 9.2
#113 NL Maastricht Netherlands 9.2
#114 DK Odense Denmark 9.2
#115 CN Tianjin China 9.2
#116 CH Geneva Switzerland 9.2
#117 NL Alkmaar Netherlands 9.2
#118 NL Amersfoort Netherlands 9.2
#119 NL Breda Netherlands 9.2
#120 MY Putrajaya Malaysia 9.2
#121 SE Uppsala Sweden 9.2
#122 JP Chiba Japan 9.2
#123 US San Jose United States 9.2
#124 US Santa Monica United States 9.2
#125 JP Nara Japan 9.2
#126 JP Matsumoto Japan 9.2
#127 FI Oulu Finland 9.2
#128 RU Moscow Russia 9.2
#129 MO Taipa Macau 9.2
#130 NL Zwolle Netherlands 9.2
#131 DK Roskilde Denmark 9.2
#132 AE Ras Al Khaimah United Arab Emirates 9.2
#133 JP Kumamoto Japan 9.2
#134 SE Västerås Sweden 9.2
#135 MC Monaco Ville Monaco 9.2
#136 CH St. Gallen Switzerland 9.2
#137 DK Horsens Denmark 9.2
#138 LU Echternach Luxembourg 9.2
#139 QA Al Khor Qatar 9.2
#140 HK Happy Valley Hong Kong 9.2
#141 LI Vaduz Liechtenstein 9.2
#142 AE Ajman United Arab Emirates 9.2
#143 LU Differdange Luxembourg 9.2
#144 LI Balzers Liechtenstein 9.2
#145 VA Vatican City Vatican City 9.2
#146 LI Eschen Liechtenstein 9.2
#147 LI Nendeln Liechtenstein 9.2
#148 MY Kuala Lumpur Malaysia 9.1
#149 PT Lisbon Portugal 9.1
#150 JP Fukuoka Japan 9.1
101–150 of 3,173