Ranked by Natural Disaster Risk
Top nomad destinations ranked by natural disaster risk, highest first.
World map
Ranked by Natural Disaster Risk
| Rank | City | Score |
|---|---|---|
| #1 |
 FI
Vaasa
Finland
|
9.4 |
| #2 |
 DK
Aarhus
Denmark
|
9.3 |
| #3 |
FI
Vantaa
Finland
|
9.3 |
| #4 |
FI
Kuopio
Finland
|
9.3 |
| #5 |
FI
Pori
Finland
|
9.3 |
| #6 |
FI
Helsinki
Finland
|
9.2 |
| #7 |
FI
Tampere
Finland
|
9.2 |
| #8 |
DK
Odense
Denmark
|
9.2 |
| #9 |
FI
Turku
Finland
|
9.2 |
| #10 |
FI
Oulu
Finland
|
9.2 |
| #11 |
DK
Helsingor
Denmark
|
9.2 |
| #12 |
DK
Roskilde
Denmark
|
9.2 |
| #13 |
FI
Jyväskylä
Finland
|
9.2 |
| #14 |
DK
Vejle
Denmark
|
9.2 |
| #15 |
FI
Lahti
Finland
|
9.2 |
| #16 |
FI
Rovaniemi
Finland
|
9.2 |
| #17 |
 SE
Lund
Sweden
|
9.1 |
| #18 |
SE
Umea
Sweden
|
9.1 |
| #19 |
 GB
Cambridge
United Kingdom
|
9.1 |
| #20 |
FI
Porvoo
Finland
|
9.1 |
| #21 |
SE
Stockholm
Sweden
|
9.0 |
| #22 |
 EE
Tartu
Estonia
|
9.0 |
| #23 |
SE
Malmö
Sweden
|
9.0 |
| #24 |
EE
Pärnu
Estonia
|
9.0 |
| #25 |
FI
Espoo
Finland
|
9.0 |
| #26 |
SE
Jönköping
Sweden
|
9.0 |
| #27 |
SE
Visby
Sweden
|
9.0 |
| #28 |
SE
Västerås
Sweden
|
9.0 |
| #29 |
SE
Norrköping
Sweden
|
9.0 |
| #30 |
 QA
Lusail
Qatar
|
9.0 |
| #31 |
GB
Bath
United Kingdom
|
9.0 |
| #32 |
SE
Luleå
Sweden
|
9.0 |
| #33 |
SE
Eskilstuna
Sweden
|
9.0 |
| #34 |
SE
Kiruna
Sweden
|
9.0 |
| #35 |
 IE
Kenmare
Ireland
|
9.0 |
| #36 |
IE
Howth
Ireland
|
9.0 |
| #37 |
GB
Tenby
United Kingdom
|
9.0 |
| #38 |
 LU
Differdange
Luxembourg
|
9.0 |
| #39 |
 NO
Reine
Norway
|
9.0 |
| #40 |
 LT
Vilnius
Lithuania
|
8.9 |
| #41 |
NO
Oslo
Norway
|
8.9 |
| #42 |
DK
Aalborg
Denmark
|
8.9 |
| #43 |
SE
Gothenburg
Sweden
|
8.9 |
| #44 |
NO
Trondheim
Norway
|
8.9 |
| #45 |
SE
Uppsala
Sweden
|
8.9 |
| #46 |
EE
Narva
Estonia
|
8.9 |
| #47 |
SE
Örebro
Sweden
|
8.9 |
| #48 |
 BE
Mons
Belgium
|
8.9 |
| #49 |
SE
Karlstad
Sweden
|
8.9 |
| #50 |
SE
Karlskrona
Sweden
|
8.9 |
1–50 of 3,173